Saturday, March 6, 2010

in response...

... to a recent conversation with an old friend, I was reminded of something I posted here a while ago and which I still fully endorse. The conversation focused on the perplexities of an increasing number of impoverished, self-deluded, disembodied, dispirited lives - or shall I say 'lifestyles' instead? - spent around pseudo-anonymous social networking websites, porn, online wanking, etc. - revealing, above all, a depressing inability or fear to become emotionally committed to someone (which has nothing whatsoever to do with formal, institutional commitments such as marriage, arghh...).

While no one, virtually no one, can purport to be immune to this kind of non-existence in our difficult times so averse to risk, I personally resist it as much as I can to preserve a minimum degree of sanity & groundedness.

So, here's to you, chérie, with a toast to what's left of a lived life!


========================


Fuses, or: inhabited bodies


Until we solve the mystery of sexuality, contemplation of kaleidoscopic genitalia - from glossy and nubile to lank and withered - will remain an interesting and important exercise in human self-discovery. . . .

Far from poisoning the mind, pornography shows the deepest truth about sexuality, stripped of its romantic veneer. No one can claim to be an expert in gender studies who is uncomfortable with pornography, which focuses on our primal identity, our rude and crude animality. Porn dreams of eternal fires of desire, without fatigue, incapacity, aging or death. What feminists denounce as woman's humiliating total accessibility in porn is actually her elevation to high priestess of a pagan paradise garden, where the body has become a bountiful fruit tree and where growth and harvest are simultaneous. "Dirt" is contamination to the Christian but fertile loam to the pagan. The most squalid images in porn are shock devices to break down bourgeois norms of decorum, reserve, and tidiness.

The Dionysian body fluids, fully released to coat every gleaming surface, return us to the full-body sensuality of the infant condition. In crowded orgy tableaux, like those on Hindu temples, matter and energy melt. In the cave spaces of porn, camera lights are torches of the Eleusinian Mysteries, giving us flashes of nature's secrets.


Camille Paglia, 'No Law in the Arena: A Pagan Theory of Sexuality', in Vamps & Tramps: New Essays (London: Viking, 1995), pp. 66-67.

************************************


While I do acknowledge the cogency of Paglia's argument - porn has no doubt a 'ritualistic' and didactic role to play and will always exist and be in great demand - there is something about it that deeply upsets me because so impoverishing. Sex seen in the crudest of lights and stripped of everything that makes it meaningful and worthwhile: intimacy, tenderness, the ambiguous play of light and shadow, the sense of an actual lived and shared life. A fully inhabited body. There is indeed a huge difference between something done to you or something that you do to someone and something you do with someone.

For a glimpse into the sheer beauty of the joyful chaos, naturalness, emotional and sensuous intensity of meaningful, inhabited sex - an inhabitedness no amount of porn or occasional intercourse between strangers will ever, ever replace - I can only vividly recommend Carolee Schneemann's Fuses (1964-67), an experimental erotic film that should figure prominently in every history of avant-garde and feminist film.

Fuses, 1964-67.
Film still.



A silent film of collaged and painted sequences of lovemaking between Schneemann and her then partner, composer James Tenney; observed by the cat, Kitch.
"...I wanted to see if the experience of what I saw would have any correspondence to what I felt-- the intimacy of the lovemaking... And I wanted to put into that materiality of film the energies of the body, so that the film itself dissolves and recombines and is transparent and dense-- as one feels during lovemaking... It is different from any pornographic work that you've ever seen-- that's why people are still looking at it! And there's no objectification or fetishization of the woman." –Carolee Schneemann
Source: http://www.caroleeschneemann.com/fuses.html


1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Recentemente reli um livro de Francisco Allen Gomes, um conhecido psiquiatra e sexólogo português (foi verdadeiramente o pai da sexologia clínica em Portugal), Paixão, Amor e Sexo. Num dos capítulos do livro, A Pornografia em Questão (D. Quixote, 2004), o autor aborda algumas questões interessantes sobre as quais também falas na tua entrada. Chamou-me a atenção uma frase que Allen Gomes cita, de Claude Chaveau, que reza assim: "O erotismo é a pornografia dos ricos, enquanto a pornografia é o erotismo dos pobres."